Rationalism and empiricism - Routledge

Rationalism and empiricism - Routledge

How do we know what exists? Michael Lacewing [email protected] Michael Lacewing Humes fork We can only have knowledge of Relations of ideas Matters of fact Relations of ideas are a

priori and analytic Matters of fact are a posteriori and synthetic Knowledge of matters of fact Knowledge of matters of fact is always a posteriori and synthetic. We gain it by using observation and employing induction and reasoning about probability. The foundation of this knowledge

is what we experience here and now, or can remember. Causal inference All our knowledge that goes beyond what is present to our senses or memory rests on causal inference. We cant know what causes what

without investigating experience. A priori knowledge of what exists Some rationalists, e.g. Plato and Descartes, challenge Humes claim; we can use reason to prove what exists A priori demonstration and intuition Demonstration = deduction

Intuition - e.g. how do you follow an argument? Descartes on the physical world We can be deceived by our senses. There are no certain indications by which we may clearly distinguish

wakefulness from sleep. The cogito I am certain that I think, I exist. I am a thinking thing. But I am not certain I have a body. So I can exist without a body. (A priori reasoning) = ?

The physical world What causes our experiences of the physical world? Physical objects Me Evil demon God

Not me: I would know if I imagined them Not evil demon or God These options would entail that God is a deceiver God exists and is not a deceiver Therefore, physical objects exist. Humes response Nothing is demonstrable, unless the contrary is a contradiction. But it is not a contradiction to deny that something exists, e.g. that God

does not exist. So a priori reasoning cant tell us what exists. Objection: this assumes that a priori reasoning can only establish analytic truths. There could be synthetic a priori truths, and God exists could be one of them.

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Doing the LEQ - Kent School District

    Doing the LEQ - Kent School District

    A. The Thesis paragraph. While not required on the rubric, a good thesis paragraph will put the topic at hand into context- you should explain the broader historical events, developments, or processes immediately relevant to the question.. While not required...
  • ECE 5984: Introduction to Machine Learning

    ECE 5984: Introduction to Machine Learning

    Environment e, Reward function r (evaluative feedback) Goal: Maximize expected reward. Examples: Robotic control, video games, board games, etc. So far talked about SL. Type of problem where have Data X, Labels Y, goals is to learn a function mapping...
  • Mobile Working Group Session Copyright  2011 Cloud Security

    Mobile Working Group Session Copyright 2011 Cloud Security

    Mobile Guidance Defined. Authentication. Apps. MDM. BYOD. What we used to limit the scope of mobile for the purposes of this initial guidance. One of the biggest reasons is because smartphones and tablets are currently the popular items.
  • Sport Obermeyer - ISyE

    Sport Obermeyer - ISyE

    Sport Obermeyer What to order? What are the issues? A Sample Problem Commit 10,000 units before show Commit 10,000 units after show Minimum of 600 units A First Approach Ignore differences in Profit margins Salvage values Ignore minimum lot sizes...
  • Foundations of Design - Cengage

    Foundations of Design - Cengage

    Foundations of Art and Design ... Horizontal Balance Vertical Balance Diagonal Balance Radial Balance Fig. 11.3 I Saw Three Cities by Kay Sage Fig. 11.4 London Portrait by Adil Jain Fig. 11.4 London Portrait by Adil Jain is an example...
  • 11 Vocabulary Unit 8 Ambulatory - Visionary Ambulatory

    11 Vocabulary Unit 8 Ambulatory - Visionary Ambulatory

    Impartial. Definition: unbiased, neutral, not favoring one side or the other. Part of speech: adjective. Sample Sentence: Jurors are supposed to be impartial; they aren't supposed to make up their minds until they've heard all the evidence
  • The Depression in Canada

    The Depression in Canada

    Became a legal party in Canada in 1924. Criticized as Un-Canadian because of its allegiance to Communist International (Comintern) operating out of Moscow. 1919, Red Scare, Section 98 of the Criminal Code outlaws the Communist Party. Party leaders were imprisoned...
  • DDoS Defense by Offense - WPI

    DDoS Defense by Offense - WPI

    Coding Gain. D. efinition :the ratio of no. of transmissions required without COPE to the no. of transmissions used by COPE to deliver the same set of packets. Theorem: In the absence of opportunistic listening, COPE's maximum coding gain is...