March 22, 2019 Interpreting The Constitution 8 Amendment:

March 22, 2019 Interpreting The Constitution 8 Amendment:

March 22, 2019 Interpreting The Constitution 8 Amendment: th Excessive bail shall not be required, nor

excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Cruel and Unusual Punishment What Does That Mean?

Punishment A punishment considered unacceptable due to the suffering, pain or humiliation of it. 5 Amendment: th

No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. Compelled to be a witness against himself

What Does That Mean? Compelled to be a witness against himself Self-Incrimination acts or declarations at trial or prior where a person implicates himself in a crime.

December 13, 2017 Interpreting The Constitution (iCivics) 1) A person is sentenced to death for murder. On the first try, the electric chair shocks the prisoner

but does not kill him. They put the prisoner back in his cell, fix the chair, and plan to try again later. Was the malfunctioning electric chair cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th Amendment? NO! The Court said the Constitution

protects against a cruel method of execution. In this case, nobody intended to cause the prisoner unnecessary pain. Just because an accident happened the first time does not mean the method itself is cruel. (Many state courts have ruled that electrocution is Louisiana rel. Francis v. Resweber (1947)

unconstitutional, butex.the Supreme 2) A prisoner is exposed to secondhand cigarette smoke while in prison. Is second-hand smoke cruel and unusual th punishment under the 8

Amendment? MAYBE (But not in this case) The Court said prison officials may not ignore a condition that could lead to serious health problems. If a prisoner was locked in his cell with a heavy smoker against his will,

that could violate the 8th amendment. In this case, the prisoner was no longer in a cell with a heavy smoker. Also, the prison had a policy to respect the wishes Helling v. McKinney (1993) 3) A person in prison hurts his back while working in prison. He is given

medical treatment, but doctors do not perform an X-ray. Was not doing an X-Ray cruel and unusual th punishment under the 8 Amendment? NO! The Court said it is cruel and

unusual punishment if a prison purposely ignores a prisoners serious injury or illness, because that would inflict unnecessary suffering and pain. But in this case, the prisoner saw the doctor many times. He was treated for his back injury as well as other medical Estelle v. Gamble (1976) problems. So

NO! The Court said it may have been bad medical judgment for the doctor not to perform an X-ray, but that is not cruel and unusual punishment. Estelle v. Gamble (1976) 4) A prisoner is beaten by prison guards while he is handcuffed and

shackled. The guards do not have a reason to use force on the prisoner. The prisoner suffers only minor injuries, including bruises, swelling, and loose teeth. Was beating up the prisoner cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th Amendment if the injuries were not

serious? YES! The Court said that prison guards may have to use force to keep order, but they are not allowed to hurt prisoners on purpose. If prison guards maliciously use force to cause harm, they violate the 8th Amendment. In that case, it doesnt matter whether the prisoners

injuries are serious. Hudson v. McMillian (1992) 5) A man is convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and murder. At the sentencing hearing, an expert testifies the defendant has an intellectual disability. The jury sentences the man to death. Is it cruel and unusual

punishment under the 8th Amendment to execute a person who has an intellectual disability? YES! The Court said research shows that defendants who have an intellectual disability often have issues that may affect their decision-making.

Therefore, the usual reasons for giving the death penalty dont apply as easily to those with an intellectual disability. Also, the issues they deal with put them more at risk of being wrongfully Atkins v. Virginia (2002) YES! The Court said that under our modern standards of decency, it

violates the 8th Amendment to execute a person who has an intellectual disability. Atkins v. Virginia (2002) 6) A judge sentences a person to death for committing murder. A state law does not allow the judge to consider any special or individual circumstances when deciding

whether to give the prisoner the death penalty. Was it cruel and unusual th punishment under the 8 Amendment for the state law to allow the death penalty but prohibit looking at special circumstances?

YES! The Court said that before sentencing someone to death for a crime, it is important to make sure that death is the appropriate punishment. There cannot be a law that stops the judge from considering special circumstances that affect whether the death penalty is appropriate for the crime.

Bell v. Ohio (1978) 7) A boy commits murder when he is 17 years old. At age 18, he is tried and sentenced to death. Was it cruel and unusual th punishment under the 8 Amendment to give the death penalty to someone

under 18? YES! The Court said juveniles under age 18 are different from adults. They are less mature and more reckless than adults. They respond more to peer pressure, and their character is not yet fully formed. Therefore Roper v. Simmons (2005)

YES! Juveniles are not among the worst offenders that the death penalty is meant for. The Court said it violates the 8th Amendment to give the death penalty to a person under 18. Roper v. Simmons (2005) 8) A state law allows public school

teachers to discipline students with corporal punishment. A middle school teacher hits several students with a wooden paddle. One student cant use his arm for a week. Was paddling the public school student cruel and unusual under the

8th Amendment? NO! The Court said children in public schools are not like prisoners in prison. Public schools are open to the public. Friends and teachers see what is going on, and kids go home each day to their families. If a school goes too far in punishing a

student, it could be sued or the teacher could face criminal charges. Ingraham v. Wright (1977) Therefore NO! The Court said public school students dont need 8th Amendment protection like prisoners do. They are protected in ways prisoners are not. 8th Amendment protection

from cruel and unusual punishment is limited to punishment for crimes. Ingraham v. Wright (1977) 1) A prisoner is being threatened by other prisoners because of a rumor that he killed a child. He is befriended by a prisoner who is a paid informant for the FBI. The informant offers to protect the

prisoner if the prisoner tells him whether the rumor is true. The prisoner admits to the murder. Did the friends offer of protection compel the suspect to be a witness against himself under the th 5 Amendment?

YES! The only reason the prisoner confessed was because he was afraid that, without protection from his friend, other prisoners would hurt him. The Court said a threat of physical violence is enough to cause a statement to be compelled. There does not have to be actual physical violence.

Arizona v. Fulminante (1991) 2) Three police officers drive a robbery suspect to the police station. The officers have not yet found the gun used in the robbery. On the way to the station, one officer mentions to another officer that there is a school for handicapped children nearby. He says it would be terrible if one of the school children finds

the gun and hurts themselves. Hearing this, the suspect tells the officers where the gun is. Did mentioning the danger to handicapped children compel the suspect to be a witness against himself under the 5th Amendment?

NO! The Court said the suspect was not compelled to confess. First, the officers were talking to each other, not to the suspect. More importantly, although the officers may have hoped the suspect would react to what they were saying, they had no reason to believe the suspect would care whether children got hurt. Rhode Island v. Innis (1980)

3) A drug addict is arrested for robbery and murder. After being in police custody for several hours, he begins to have severe withdrawal symptoms. The police call a doctor, who gives the suspect medication. Nobody realizes that one of the medications has the effect of a truth serum. The police continue to question the suspect. Within

a short time, the suspect confesses. Did the medicine compel the suspect to be a witness against himself under the 5th Amendment even though the police didnt know it was a truth serum?

YES (but) In this case, the Court said it didnt matter whether the police realized the medication had the effect of a truth serum. If the suspect could not exercise his free will, then his statements were compelled. However Townsend v. Sain (1963)

YES (but) In a later case, the Court said a confession is only compelled if there is some kind of police wrongdoing. Even so, the later case did not overrule this one. The Court said the officers knew the suspect had been given drugs, which was enough. Colorado v. Connelly

4) Investigators trying to solve a murder want to know whether a certain shirt belongs to the suspect. They make the suspect try the shirt on despite his objection, and the shirt fits him. This evidence is used in a trial to help convict him. Did making him try on the shirt compel the suspect

to be a witness against himself under the 5th Amendment? NO! The Court said being a witness against yourself only applies to communication. When he was forced to put on the shirt, he was not forced to communicate anything. If the 5th Amendment

could stop this, then it could also stop the jury from looking at the suspect and comparing him to a Holt v. U.S. (1910) photograph of someone. 5) Detectives take a suspect into an interrogation room and ask her questions. The detectives do not tell her what her rights are before they ask her questions. She confesses to a

crime. Does interrogating someone without telling them their rights compel them to be a witness against themselves under the 5th Amendment?

SORT OF! The Court said that when a person is interrogated by police, there is a great danger that the person will be compelled to speak. A person is put into an unfamiliar place away from other people. During an interrogation, police often behave in an intimidating way because they are trying to get information.

Miranda v. Arizona Because of this SORT OF! The Court said peoples right against self-incrimination must be safeguarded. In order to guard against people being compelled to speak against themselves, police must tell them what their rights are before questioning begins. If they

dont, they cant use the persons statements as evidence. Miranda v. Arizona 6) A man is arrested at a hospital after a car accident. The officer believes the man has been drinking and driving. He orders a doctor to take a blood sample even though the man protests. The sample shows alcohol in the mans blood.

Did forcing the suspect to give a blood sample compel him to be a witness against himself under the 5th Amendment? NO! When the officer told the doctor to take the blood sample even after

the suspect protested, the suspect was compelled to give blood. However, the Court said being a witness against yourself only applies to communication. The suspect was compelled to give physical evidence. He was not Schmerber v. California 7) After a drug raid, a suspect

ended up in the intensive care unit. The barely conscious suspect was hooked up to all sorts of tubes and equipment. Detectives go to his bedside and interrogate him. Even though the suspect keeps asking them to stop, the detectives continue to ask questions. His statements are used at trial to convict him.

Did questioning the suspect in the hospital compel him to be a witness against himself under the 5th Amendment? YES! The suspect was at the detectives

mercy. He could not move because of all the equipment he was hooked up to, and he was in a lot of pain. He also said he was confused and could not think clearly. The detective ignored all the suspects requests to stop the interrogation. The Court said that under these circumstances, the suspect could Mincey

v. Arizona (1978) 8 December 13, 2017 th Amendment

REVIEW True or False? 1) The Court doesnt believe any punishment is cruel and unusual if someone is a criminal. True False

The whole point of the 8th Amendment is to protect criminals from excessive punishment. True or False? 2) Whether a punishment is ruled cruel and unusual

under the Constitution often depends on the details of the situation. True False Different situations call for a different

analysis of what is cruel and unusual. True or False? 3) What the Court says is cruel and unusual under the Constitution might be different from your personal idea of cruel. Not only that, but

True False the Court has said the definition of cruel and unusual will change as society True or False?

4) Its easy to figure out whether a situation qualifies as cruel and unusual punishment. True False The Court must look at all the

details and consider how it has decided cases in the past. True or False? 5) The 8th Amendment only applies where someone has committed a crime, not in other situations. So far, this is what

True False the Court has said. But the Court could decide to interpret the Constitution differently in the

True or False? 6) The Court has a list of cruel and unusual punishments that it uses to decide the cases. True False

Each situation is different. True or False? 7) The Court sometimes considers whether officials intended to cause pain and suffering. True

False The Court cares whether prison officials were trying to hurt people or just trying to do their jobs. True or False? 8) The death penalty is

considered cruel and unusual as applied to some groups of people but not others. True False For example, juveniles and people with an

intellectual disability may not be executed. 5 December 13, 2017 th

Amendment REVIEW True or False? 1) Compelled means forced. True False

The 5th Amendment prohibits forcing suspects to communicate evidence against themselves. True or False? 2) With the 5th Amendment,

the Court is worried about police wrongdoing that forces a confession. True False The Court has talked about the intimidating

environment and tactics used during police interrogation. True or False? 3) Its easy to figure out whether someone was compelled. True

False The Court must look at the details of each situation. True or False? 4) Being a witness against yourself only applies to communicating information.

True False The Court has said trying on a shirt, for example, is not communication. True or False? 5) Suspects are completely

protected because police cant make them be a witness against themselves. True False There are some things police can make suspects do

that arent considered True or False? 6) The Court doesnt care how police get a confession as long as the criminal is caught. True

False Thats the whole point of the 5th Amendment! True or False? 7) The main consequence of violating the 5th Amendment is not being able to use the evidence against the

suspect. Evidence obtained True False by compelling someone to be a witness against themself cant be

used to convict the True or False? 8) People suspected of a crime have the right to remain silent. True False

The Court has put protections in place to safeguard this right. Police must read suspects their rights.

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Frontiers of microeconomics

    Frontiers of microeconomics

    Arrow's Impossibility Theorem. Arrow's impossibility theorem: a mathematical result showing that, under certain assumed conditions, there is no scheme for aggregating individual preferences into a valid set of social preferences.
  • Overview of the Office of the Inspector General

    Overview of the Office of the Inspector General

    Auditors review CCS claims to determine their compliance with written Medicaid and CCS guidelines and regulations. OIG examines CCS services that were billed as either psychosocial rehabilitation or provider travel time. When discrepancies are found, OIG seeks to recover payments...
  • Improving the visibility of Indian Research: An Institutional ...

    Improving the visibility of Indian Research: An Institutional ...

    Arial Calibri Times New Roman Trebuchet MS Tahoma resourcewebbanner 1_resourcewebbanner Improving the visibility of Indian Research: An Institutional, Open Access Publishing Model NCSI, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore Agenda The Problem Local access to global research Global access to Indian...
  • SYSTEMS DEFINITION REVIEW Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew

    SYSTEMS DEFINITION REVIEW Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew

    1.055 times empty weight for 2x swing wing titanium boxes carbon nanotube reinforced (reasons stronger materials, less sweep needed, system of actuators, and each wing is a bit smaller then conventional
  • Products and Services - Hatem Masri

    Products and Services - Hatem Masri

    Author: Lance Matheson Created Date: 10/08/2010 13:50:11 Title: Products and Services Last modified by: DR.Hatem
  • Ecology lecture Part 2 spring 2010 BIO 102-001

    Ecology lecture Part 2 spring 2010 BIO 102-001

    Communities In economics - "follow the money", in ecology, "follow the food" Around my barn - Dillon Bustin When the hound begins to howl And I've not heard a hooting owl When the chickens begin to squawk That's the time...
  • Germany 1815- 1862

    Germany 1815- 1862

    Canada's New Flag. Quiet Revolution/ FLQ. Expo '67. Tommy Douglas - Universal Health care. Trudeaumania. Auto Pact. 1969-1975. Pierre Trudeau. Major events during this era: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. October Crisis. OPEC Oil Crisis / National Energy Program.
  • Virtual Private Networking - Anvari.Net

    Virtual Private Networking - Anvari.Net

    Virtual Private Networking Karlene R. Samuels COSC513 What is a VPN A VPN provides end users with a way to privately access information on their corporate network (eg. an Intranet) over a public network infrastructure such as the Internet.