Point of Care Research

Point of Care Research

Point of Care Research Engineering a Learning Healthcare System Mary T. Brophy, MD MPH [email protected] The State of Clinical Evidence Generation Randomized Controlled Trials Gold standard Resource intense Relatively few in number Observational studies

Affordable Bigger ns Contend with bias Medical Evidence: Where Is It? Lots of guidelines not much evidence Guidelines not implemented How can we develop more and better evidence? Are Guidelines Based on Evidence? ACC/AHA Guidelines 1984-2008 Number of recommendations increased from 1330 to 1973

(+48%) Only 314 of 2711 recommendations were evidence level A (11%) 1246 were level C (48%) Only 245 of 1305 class I recommendations were level of evidence A (19%) Too complex Barriers in process of care Tricoci P et al. JAMA 2009;301:831-841 Do Practitioners Follow Guidelines?

Multiple studies show that practitioners adherence to guidelines is often poor Reasons Not based on level A evidence Do not apply to individual patients Calvin JE et al. Congest Heart Fail 2012;18:73-78; Westergaard B et al. Clin Toxicol 2012;50:129-135; Burns SM Clin Nurse Spec 2012;26:22-28 Traditional clinical trials are too

expensive Require site and coordinating center study staff Informatics infrastructure Regulatory oversight Informed consent , safety reporting and engagement in research Financing not aligned with needs of healthcare system Result: Not scalable for Clinical Effectiveness Research Health R&D as a Percentage of Health Costs

Sources: NIH Data Book; Research!America, Investment in U.S. Health Research 2001, 2002, 2004-2009 Problem Statement Healthcare systems research needs are not fully met by the current research enterprise Designed for basic science inquiry and drug discovery There is no scalable model for:

Clinical Effectiveness Research research comparing known treatments Biomarker validation (Personalized Medicine) For diagnostics, prognostic or therapeutic indications A Solution Creation of a Learning Healthcare System that creates locally applicable knowledge Identifies its own needs Uses its own infrastructure Adapts available research methodology

Directly implements research results The knowledge gained is thus not generalizable (thus not research) but rather is locally selfish. Point of Care Research (POCR) A powerful tool of the learning healthcare system POCR- Clinical Trial Example A clinical trial with a substantial portion of its operations conducted by clinical staff in the

course of providing patient/subjects routine clinical care and where the choice of treatment is between two equivalent options POCR Clinical Trials - Approach Clinical research performed with minimal perturbation of the clinical care ecosystem Subject identification and randomization occurs at usual health care encounter Minimal study-defined procedures or visits (mostly directed via EMR) Outcome data captured passively Convert to decision support and implementation

POCR Schema Care providers using EMR Cohort Identification Enroll & Consent Data Capture Study DB

Randomize Clinical Decision Support Analysis Study team using traditional scientific tools Intervention POCR Requirements

Next-generation EMR Incorporate study logic and workflows Data and knowledgebase connectivity Decision support sophistication Culture change for patients and providers Change in regulatory requirements

Informed consent Engagement in research Adverse event reporting POCR - Pilot Study Goals A pilot study was adapted to assess the following: 1. Ability to modify the of EMR (VistA) to conduct the research 2. Physician and patient acceptance 3. IRB and regulatory acceptance of approach 4. Identification of logistical obstacles

POCR Use Case Initiated as a Boston VA initiative Insulin protocol Sliding scale insulin regimen Weight based insulin regimen Both regimens are approved and in use at VA Boston No published data comparing outcomes

POCR Insulin Protocol Open label RCT comparing the regimens Inclusion: inpatients who require an insulin regimen and are not in the ICU Exclusion: inability to give informed consent Endpoints: Primary - LOS Secondary - inpatient glycemic control and readmission within 30 days for glycemic control

POCR Insulin Protocol Methods No modification of the current sliding scale or weight based regimens as they exist in the VA Boston VistA system Interface with clinicians entirely through the VistA

packages Data collection and follow-up is done passively through the VistA system POCR in the VA VistA - VA EMR Use existing features within EMR Alert System Order sets

Consult System Customize features Identify, enroll and randomize patients Embed processes in dialogue boxes Recruitment Workflow View of the Endocrine Medication Menu in VistA: Consider Patient for Study Enrollment Select Option 1

Study Information Page Study Information and Instructions (select Yes or No) Enrollment Note Entry Dialog template for note (decision to enroll) Consent Process for the Study Randomization for insulin treatment introduced by

clinician; patient willing to talk with study nurse Study nurse explains study and seeks consent Signed Informed Consent short, three-paged ICF with three options: 1) randomization and chart surveillance, 2) no randomization and permit chart surveillance, 3) decline participation Signed HIPAA authorization Closing the Implementation Gap Hybrid Bayesian/frequentist approach adaptive learning

Use of Bayesian posterior probability to reset the randomization (adaptive randomization) Use of conventional (frequentist) error rate calculations to evaluate the evidence Learning promotes automated implementation of the winning strategy POCR Recruitment Summary Recruitment

Number of Eligible Patients No response from clinician Clinician refusal Clinician participation Number of Eligible Patients Approached Patients refusal Patients enrolled Randomized Chart review only N (%) 146 17 (11.6%)

28 (19.2%) 101 (69.2%) 101 4 (4%) 97 (96%) 88 (87%) 9 (9%) Point of Care Research (POCR) From the Specific to the General And Future Direction

Optimal Study Attributes for POCR Limited to questions of the type: which approved treatment works better? Interventions with well described toxicity Broad inclusion criteria; limited exclusion criteria Objectively identifiable endpoints Minimal need for study specific visits Requirements For POC Adoption Rethink relationship between clinical care and research

Revisit engagement in research, consent, adverse event reporting Educate to create a cultural change in responsibilities of patients Reengineer the EMR infrastructure To allow questions to be asked and answered

To facilitate decision-support adoption Develop novel analytical approaches New ideas for supporting research Alternative to the investigator-initiated approach Support of research by clinical care dollars

POCR - Advantages Pragmatic qualities address issues of Clinical Effectiveness Results directly relevant to healthcare system (locally selfish research) Ability to assess long-term clinically relevant outcomes (lower cost) Faster (immediate) Integration of results into practice thereby lowering the T2 translation barrier Enhanced acceptance by providers Adaptive randomization Conversion to a decision support node Improved logistics: Facilitation of economic analysis

Accommodates device and strategy studies POCR Trials Will Not: Explain how biological, etiologic, or behavioral mechanisms interact to produce the observed clinical outcomes Test new therapies where side effects are not well established From the Present to the Future State Early introduction of Point of Care Research to regulatory/oversight thought leaders to plan the way

forward Consider implementation requirements - from single site with highly engaged research personnel using in-person informed consent to national rollout Conduct focus groups of providers and patients to better understand acceptability Ethical and Regulatory Issues in POCR Informed consent Engaged in research Serious adverse event reporting Individual vs Collaborative Experiment

physicians make therapeutic experiments daily on their patients.medicine by its nature is an experimental science but it must apply the experimental method systematically. Claude Bernard, 1865 This is what I regard as the University spirit, not simply diagnosing a patient and deciding what to do for him in order to earn our fee, but what we can get out of this case in order to do better next time. Obituary of Sir FrancisFrasier, BMJ 1964 in Baum, Lancet, 1986 Little progress has been made resolving the paradox of informed consent being unnecessary for the uncontrolled experimentation of normal practice but required for clinical research. Hutton, 2001

Ethical Benefits of POCR Individualized clinical care linked with systematic research Honest admission of uncertainty in medical decisions Wider clinician and patient participation thus, wider applicability of results Option for adaptive randomization favoring more participants receiving the beneficial intervention Potentially shorter implementation times thus, potentially earlier results and benefits to healthcare system Ethical Risk of POCR Harm to doctorpatient relationship and respect for doctors knowledge and authority

Patient-centered care compromised Inadequate informed consent process time-pressured patient vulnerable to coercion waiver of documentation Clinical care setting may impede providing patient with ongoing information relating to study participation Informed Consent Debate All trial protocols must be reviewed by award-granting bodies and local ethics committees (IRBs) that said. For Informed Consent: patients rights to self determination study information improves patient

understanding of nature of disease and treatment signed consent provides physician and institutional protection Against Informed Consent: difficulty for patient to comprehend nature of disease, uncertainty of treatment and need for randomization undermines confidence in doctor bias created by refusals delays inherent in consent process from Baum Do we need informed consent The Lancet, 1986 Informed Consent Debate Fully informed consent is unobtainable ideal, concepts too abstract and details too technical; hence, all trials might be considered as unethical.

One approach - abandon requirement of informed consent, relying on safeguards such as ethics committees (IRBs). Another approach - retain spirit of informed consent; take measures to maximize patient understanding; rely on ethics committees as a further level of protection. Authors favor last approach allowing patients to bring values and knowledge into play, to understand concept of equipoise and to make expectations of intervention more realistic. British Health Technology Assessment, 1998 Cluster Randomization Intact units are allocated different interventions. Consent for intervention from a guardian e.g. head of a

group practice or firm best having several guardians to minimize conflicts of interest. Must always guard against authority submitting persons to unwarranted and/or unsafe experimentation. Must also consider validity of design and analysis, freedom to leave a trial, implications of early stopping of a trial. Hutton, in Statistics in Medicine 2001; Sabin et al., Hastings Center Report 2008 Waiver of Informed Consent The research involves no more than minimal risk

to the subjects The waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects The research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver or alteration Whenever appropriate, the subjects will be provided with additional pertinent information McCrae AD et al, Trials 2011;12:202; Weijer C et al, Trials 2011;12:100 Criteria for HIPAA Waiver

Use or disclosure involves no more than minimal risk Research could not be practically done without waiver Privacy risks are reasonable vis. a vis. benefits to individuals or importance of research

Plan to destroy identifiers exists Assurance that data will not be reused or disclosed to others except for research that would also qualify for a waiver. OHRP Guidance on Engagement in Research Not engaged in research if:

Provide services that would typically be performed as part of routine clinical monitoring and/or follow-up of subjects Do not administer the study interventions being tested or evaluated under the protocol Do not obtain informed consent SAE Reporting FDA is encouraging risk based monitoring

Require reporting AEs only if unexpected, serious and would have implications for conduct of study What is unexpected? Single occurrence of serious event that is uncommon and strongly associated with drug exposure or uncommon in study population More frequent than expected

More severe than expected POCR IRB Decision? At what point in the spectrum of medical knowledge discovery are assumptions like these reasonable? 1) POC research comparing two approved interventions introduces no risks beyond those normally encountered by patients receiving such treatments, and thus, having provided patients with appropriate information and choices, informed consent can be waived. and 2) It is impractical to obtain HIPAA authorization in that

informed consent was not required and since well-proven procedures were in place to ensure the confidentiality and security of any identifiers and protected health information obtained from medical records. 3) The treating clinicians, within their scope of practice, are simply offering patients either treatment A, treatment B or a roughly 50:50 chance of treatment A or B. Thus, they need not be identified or credentialed as members of the research team. Example June 2011 Dear Veteran,

We would like to inform you of a change in your prescription for mesalamine tablets or capsules. We will be changing your medication to mesalamine SA CAPSULES (APRISO). Both products contain the same drug and work in a similar way. Both medications are safe and effective for your condition. Mesalamine is used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and other conditions as determined by your provider. Mesalamine SA CAPSULES (APRISO) have the advantage of using one common dose and

are only taken once a day. Please finish all of your remaining supply of mesalamine EC TABLETS (ASACOL) before starting your new mesalamine SA CAPSULES (APRISO) prescription. Do NOT use both mesalamine products at the same time. Read your prescription label carefully as the number of tablets and how often you take mesalamine may be different. The doctors and pharmacists at your VA clinic have authorized this change. If you have any questions regarding this letter please call the pharmacy. Sincerely, The Boston VA Healthcare System Pharmacy Department Discussion

What level of patient and provider implicit or explicit consent is needed? Notification +/- opt out General enrollment into a program (non-study specific) Consent verbal +/- witness written Point of Care Research Team

Principal Investigators: Louis Fiore and Philip Lavori Co-Investigators: Mary Brophy, James Kaufman, Mike Gaziano and Matt Liang and Ryan Ferguson Informatics: Leonard DAvolio and Chester Conrad CPRS Engineers: Gus ONeil and Tom Sabin Ethics and Informed Consent: John Hermos Pilot Content Expert: Stephen Swartz Data Management: Lauren Weil Statisticians: Philip Lavori, Robert Lew, Gheorghe Doros and Sarah Leatherman Point of Care Research

Sponsored by the VA Cooperative Studies Program Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs Additional NIH support to Stanford University is gratefully acknowledged CTSA UL1 RR025744 CCSG P30 CA124435

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Embedding and Sketching: Lecture 1

    Embedding and Sketching: Lecture 1

    NNS for small doubling dimension. Euclidean space[Indyk-Naor'07] JL into dimension ?=?(?)"works" ! Contractionof . any pair . happens with very small probability
  • Vocabulary for "The Sniper"

    Vocabulary for "The Sniper"

    Arial Calibri Baskerville Old Face Wingdings Office Theme Vocabulary for "The Sniper" Check your spelling! Paroxysm noun a sudden activity, outburst , or convulsion Oh—an FYI: This story also contains the word "parapet." You don't need to write it down,...
  • Kariera, Aranda et Orokaiva - Université de Montréal

    Kariera, Aranda et Orokaiva - Université de Montréal

    L'expression remonte à deux chercheurs australiens B. Spencer et F. Gillen qui en 1899 publient Northern Tribes of Central Australia et notent que les Aranda parlent de 'alcheringa' (ou des variants, comme churinga), une sorte de temps perdu et sacré,...
  • Example: Electric resistive heaters are often used in

    Example: Electric resistive heaters are often used in

    Transient Energy Balance (Unsteady State) Heat in q=dQ/dt Work out dW/dt E(t) not constant (4.19), p. 157 in Cengel's book Example: Steam at a pressure of 2 MPa and a temperature of 350° C is exiting out from a tank...
  • www.imthatteacher.com

    www.imthatteacher.com

    Acevedo uses alliteration throughout this poem. Identify 3 examples. What is the effect of this simile? "This poster feels personal, like an engraved invitation mailed directly to me." Many artists are insecure about people hearing/seeing their work. Why do you...
  • PAF 101 - Lecture Four

    PAF 101 - Lecture Four

    paf 101 Module 2, Lecture 1 "An educated person is one who has learned that information almost always turns out to be at best incomplete and very often false, misleading, fictitious---just dead wrong."
  • Potential Vorticity - University of Washington

    Potential Vorticity - University of Washington

    Times MS Pゴシック Arial Calibri Symbol Wingdings Office Theme Microsoft Equation Potential Vorticity President's Day Positive PV Anomaly Near Trop Negative PV Anomaly Near Trop Surface +PV Anomaly Piecewise PV Inversion PowerPoint Presentation Stoelinga MWR. 124,5 1996: Overheads Stoelinga 96...
  • Business Ethics Fundamentals

    Business Ethics Fundamentals

    Three Models of Management Ethics Immoral Management Moral Management Amoral Management Two Hypotheses Making Moral Management Actionable Developing Moral Judgment Levels of Moral Development Sources of a Manager's Values Elements of Moral Judgment Moral Imagination Moral Identification and Ordering Moral...